@Article{HajraEcheTsurGonz:2014:HIPrCI,
author = "Hajra, Rajkumar and Echer, Ezequiel and Tsurutani, Bruce T. and
Gonzalez, Walter Demetrio",
affiliation = "{Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and {Instituto
Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and {Jet Propulsion
Laboratory (JPL) - California Institute of Technology} and
{Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)}",
title = "Solar wind-magnetosphere energy coupling efficiency and
partitioning: HILDCAAs and preceding CIR storms during solar cycle
23",
journal = "Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics",
year = "2014",
volume = "119",
number = "4",
pages = "2675–2690",
month = "Apr.",
keywords = "solar wind-magnetosphere energy coupling efficiency,
magnetospheric energy partitioning, HILDCAAs, CIR storms, joule
heating, ring current injection.",
abstract = "A quantitative study on the energetics of the solar
wind-magnetosphere-ionosphere system during High-Intensity,
Long-Duration, Continuous AE Activity (HILDCAA) events for solar
cycle 23 (from 1995 through 2008) is presented. For all HILDCAAs,
the average energy transferred to the magnetospheric/ionospheric
system was ~6.3\ ×1016 J, and the ram kinetic energy of the
incident solar wind was ~7.1\ ×1018 J. For individual
HILDCAA events the coupling efficiency, defined as the ratio of
the solar wind energy input to the solar wind kinetic energy,
varied between 0.3% and 2.8%, with an average value of ~0.9%. The
solar wind coupling efficiency for corotating interaction region
(CIR)-driven storms prior to the HILDCAA events was found to vary
from ~1% to 5%, with an average value of ~2%. Both of these values
are lower than the> 5% coupling efficiency noted for
interplanetary coronal mass ejection (and sheath)-driven magnetic
storms. During HILDCAAs, ~67% of the solar wind energy input went
into Joule heating, ~22% into auroral precipitation, and ~11% into
the ring current energy. The CIR-storm Joule heating (~49%) was
noticeably less than that during HILDCAAs, while the ring current
energies were comparable for the two. Joule dissipation was higher
for HILDCAAs that followed CIR-storms (88%) than for isolated
HILDCAAs (~60%). Possible physical interpretations for the
statistical results obtained in this paper are discussed.",
doi = "10.1002/2013JA019646",
url = "http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2013JA019646",
issn = "2169-9402",
label = "self-archiving-INPE-MCTI-GOV-BR",
language = "en",
targetfile = "RevisedManuscript.pdf",
urlaccessdate = "03 maio 2024"
}